On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 11:39:12 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 10:47:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Stanislav Blinov:
Range interface should be minimal.
I agree. But I didn't mean to ask for that operator in the
Range protocol. I think some ranges should define a ~
operator. It's easy to write a "chainable" trait. I did that
for my nonstandard D1 library.
Bye,
bearophile
Could you post the isChainable trait?
I'm curious :)
/Per
Ahh, I guess you mean
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/bug-604...@http.d.puremagic.com%2Fissues%2F
/Per
