On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 21:20:06 UTC, Kapps wrote:
That pull shows that the previous behaviour was to use enforce? Isn't this very expensive, particularly considering that enforce uses lazy non-scope arguments?
Yes.
On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 21:20:06 UTC, Kapps wrote:
That pull shows that the previous behaviour was to use enforce? Isn't this very expensive, particularly considering that enforce uses lazy non-scope arguments?
Yes.