On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 04:37:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
enforce(cond, "failure");
really should just translate to something close to
if(!cond) throw new Exception("failure");
but it doesn't do anything close to that. And as long as it
doesn't, enforce
is of questionable value in any code that cares about
efficiency.
- Jonathan M Davis
As a workaround, I'm sure we could specialize enforce without
lazy for built-in types?
BTW: Why *is* enforce lazy again? I don't really see it. I makes
more sense for things like "collectException" I guess, but I
don't see it for enforce.
