Looking at old data, it is the dmd version that's changed, so I
think this is the likely reason.
Andrew
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 20:45:23 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 18:41:55 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 30/05/14 18:13, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Are you sure you are compiling with the same version of dmd
and gdc? Fixes were
made to the rand.d library in the latest release, which could
explain the
difference you are observing.
Which fixes are you thinking of here ... ? I don't recall
anything that ought to alter the behaviour of the standard
random number generator.
Didn't you make changes to how and when the global PRNG is
popped and accessed in randomShuffle? I figured it *could* be
an explanation.
