On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 21:34:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 14 August 2014 at 21:11:51 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
IIRC it manages the capacity information manually instead of
calling the runtime which reduces appending overhead.
That would make some sense, though it must be completely
avoiding ~= then and probably is even GC-mallocing the array
itself. Regardless, I clearly need to study the code if I want
to know what it's actually doing.
- Jonathan M Davis
I wonder if using plain `Array` instead may be result in better
performance where immutability is not needed.
