Re: DIP64 - Regarding 'pure' and 'nothrow'

[Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-learn]

It would be nice if we could at least allow both "nothrow" and 
"@nothrow". Because "nothrow" is already a keyword there's no 
possibility of a UDA overriding it. This would at least give 
people the option of making their code look nicer.

The "delete" keyword is deprecated[1] and making that decision 
never broke any code.

[1] http://dlang.org/deprecate.html#delete