On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 20:17:11 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
It would be nice if we could at least allow both "nothrow" and "@nothrow". Because "nothrow" is already a keyword there's no possibility of a UDA overriding it. This would at least give people the option of making their code look nicer.
So no chance even of this? Make it an either/or situation, which would prevent code-breakage but also encourage @-style usage as developers would presumably try and maintain consistency? Admittedly I haven't looked at the compiler source-code, but surely its infrastructure wouldn't make this prohibitively hard to do? I wouldn't mind taking a crack at it myself if it's something that can be done without too much hassle.
