On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 16:32:24 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
If anything, I'd have expected you to provide something returns the popped element. What you do pops an element, and then returns the *next* one. What good is that?
My mistake. It's fixed now.
Also, what you want to check is "hasSlicing", which is more powerful than "isRA". Speaking of which, if you don't have "isRA", it looks like your range errors out (no "front").
Ok. Fixed know.
Your sliding splitter does not handle narrow strings. I'd have thought that was the original goal. Well, it is better to not support it at all of course, rather than doing it wrong :)
That's part of episode 2, for now ;)
