On Saturday, 4 October 2014 at 15:54:26 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:29:55 +0000
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn
<digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com>
wrote:
I don't really see the point though.
class A
{
void foo(int a) { Afoo(this, a); }
}
then declare and define Afoo however you like.
it's noisy hackery and namespace pollution. sure i can do this
and i'm
using this trick when it's better to define some methods for
class/struct in another module, but i don't like it.
It is a little noisy, but really very little. The only extra
noise is the call to Afoo.
Namespace pollution? In what way would that cause a problem here?
