On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 13:23:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 12:16:14 UTC, eles wrote:
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 11:54:56 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 10:10:04 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 4 October 2014 at 15:29:57 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
On Saturday, 4 October 2014 at 11:19:52 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 11:01:28 +0000
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-learn
This isn't a problem. You're not going to get the name-mangling
right by accident. Even for free functions the module name is
mangled in.
It is. I could erase the definition of an identical class in
another .d file and accidentally leave an orphan definition
method therein.
The only way this can happen is with extern(C) functions, which
is because C doesn't mangle it's function names.
This too is a hole. Why to leave holes?
I like the "fromage à trous":
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxe_du_fromage_à_trous
But not in my software.
