On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:35:03 +0000, weaselcat wrote: > Seems like a useful feature(useful enough to get past the C++ > standards committee,) consider submitting a phobos PR?
ah, c++ committee accepts by randomness. ;-) honestly, i can't see why it's useful and where it can be used. and it's so easy to write anyway, so i think that there is virtually no sense in adding something like this to Phobos.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
