On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:45:34 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Huh? You mean with string literals? That would be a rather
silly reason to avoid `char[]`. Please show an example of .dup
you'd like to avoid.
Yes, string literals.
I understand that the type of `string[]` to D is a simple data
type than `char[][]`,
Are you saying that `string[]` is simpler than `char[][]`?
That's not true: `string` is an alias for `immutable(char)[]`,
so `string[]` is the same as `immutable(char)[][]`.
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
But really, a string is immutable. There's not a way around
that. A string is the most basic level of array primitive, not
even mutable arrays of non-char types have that, and it's an
annoyance. From there, you have to build the data out of ROM
into the heap.
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mjctql$j19$1...@digitalmars.com
