On Saturday, 1 August 2015 at 17:22:40 UTC, NX wrote:
I wonder if the followings are compiler bugs:
No, it is by design, the idea is to keep static arrays smallish so null references will be caught by the processor. (An overly large static array could allow indexing it through a null pointer to potentially reach another object.)
The easiest workaround is to just dynamically allocate such huge arrays:
byte[] arr = new byte[](1024*1024*16); ReadProcessMemory(Proc, 0xdeadbeef, arr.ptr, arr.length, null); The arr.ptr and arr.length are the key arguments there.
