V Sat, 01 Aug 2015 19:21:36 +0000 NX via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> napsáno:
> On Saturday, 1 August 2015 at 18:50:09 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: > > No you don't. You still use static allocation for array > > Can clarify why does that happen and I still suspect it's a > static allocation it would increase output exe if it was really > that static..? No it would not increase output exe. Problem is with definition: type[size] val; // static declaration so compilere check max 16M. But you are right, in your case it could be improved and such declaration could work. because: S { byte[16*1024*1024*1024] arr; } void main() { auto s = new S(); if (s is null) { // error cannont allocate enought memory } } but: void main() { byte[16*1024*1024*1024] arr; // impossible to check if is allocated } Maybe you can open an enhancment on issues.dlang.org