On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 21:43:17 UTC, ponce wrote:
Additionally, I was said weeks ago on this NG that and signed overflow in D is not actually Undefined Behaviour.
Interesting.. The reference is fairly terse on exactly what happens, is it more formally specified anywhere? In which case Elder's objection melts away for D and becomes explicitly "prefer signed for D, but don't mix".
For integral operands, the *, /, and % correspond to multiply, divide, and modulus operations. For multiply, overflows are ignored and simply chopped to fit into the integral type.
