Shriramana Sharma wrote: > Why is it impossible for a Regex object to be > `immutable`?
I find that I can't declare it as `const` either... This is most curious! -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d-learn Fri, 01 Jan 2016 18:05:47 -0800
Shriramana Sharma wrote: > Why is it impossible for a Regex object to be > `immutable`?
I find that I can't declare it as `const` either... This is most curious! -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953