cym13 wrote: > Is it that you > can't make an immutable regex()? In that case it is a > runtime-related issue and those variables just have to be > mutable. Or is it that you want to be able to use an immutable or > const regex (be it from regex() or ctRegex!()) with matchAll()? > In the latter case it is matchAll's fault for not garanteeing the > immutability of the regex (and may even qualify as a bug IMHO) > but you can « cast(Regex!char)numbers » it if you must so it > isn't hard to work arround it.
Yes after your comments I realized that it's not so much that I cannot create an immutable or const symbol referring to a Regex object but that I cannot use it with matchAll etc. But of what use is a Regex object if it cannot be used with matchAll etc? -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
