On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 02:11:15 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
What I like most about your proposal is that it doesn't break any existing code that wasn't broken before. That can't be emphasized enough.
Although I wish more than 3 people had voted in my poll, two of them did claim to need the `ref`-ness of `Tuple.slice`, so I don't think we can just ditch it. (I did not vote.)
If you guys want to add a return-by-value version, it should be treated as an enhancement, not a bug fix in my opinion.
