Dne 21.2.2017 v 08:31 Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
On Monday, 20 February 2017 at 13:16:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
dmd is great for fast compilation and therefore it's great for
development. However, while it produces decent binaries, and it may
very well do certain optimizations better than the gcc or llvm
backends do
This I find hard to believe. Do you have an example where DMD
generates faster code than GDC or LDC ?
Thanks,
Johan
I remember there has been some. One has been a problem with loop
elimination, where ldc was not able to remove some of loops which does
not do anything and dmd was, but I believe it has been fixed now.
