On Saturday, 25 February 2017 at 19:59:29 UTC, ikod wrote:
Hello,

I have a method for range:

struct Range {
    immutable(ubyte[]) _buffer;
    size_t             _pos;

    @property void popFront() pure @safe {
enforce(_pos < _buffer.length, "popFront from empty buffer");
        _pos++;
    }
}

I'd like to have @nogc here, but I can't because enforce() is non-@nogc. I have a trick but not sure if it is valid, especially I don't know if optimization will preserve code, used for throwing:

import std.string;

struct Range {
    immutable(ubyte[]) _buffer;
    size_t  _pos;

    this(immutable(ubyte[]) s) {
        _buffer = s;
    }
    @property void popFront() pure @safe @nogc {
        if (_pos >= _buffer.length ) {
            auto _ = _buffer[$]; // throws RangeError
        }
        _pos++;
    }
}

void main() {
        auto r = Range("1".representation);
        r.popFront();
        r.popFront(); // throws
}

Is it ok to use it? Is there any better solution?

Thanks!

You can wrap a gc function in a nogc call using a function pointer that casts it to a nogc. You do this first by casting to void* then back to the same signature as the function + @nogc. This "tricks" the compiler in to calling the gc function from a nogc function. The problem is, of course, it is not safe if the gc is turned off as it will result in a memory leak. This may or may not be an issue with enforce depending on if it allocates before or after the check.



Reply via email to