On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 02:19:15 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Pretty funny. But seriously, this is something that just work. There is now to layers of indirection to achieve what I used to do quite naturally in the language.
*should just work
Re: .sort vs sort(): std.algorithm not up to the task?
Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn Wed, 07 Jun 2017 19:26:05 -0700
- .sort vs sort(): std.algorithm no... Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std.alg... Mike B Johnson via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std... Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort():... Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort():... Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std.alg... Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std... Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std.alg... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std.alg... Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort():... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort(): std... Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort():... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: .sort vs sort():... Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-learn
