Only nullify() can make isNull return true again. I need that semantic.
Quick idea without much afterthought: instead of Nullable, use pointer to o?
Re: Is Nullable supposed to provide Optional semantics?
Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:50:33 -0800
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 21:43:25 UTC, Chris Paulson-Ellis
wrote:
- Is Nullable supposed to provi... Chris Paulson-Ellis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is Nullable supposed... vit via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is Nullable supp... Chris Paulson-Ellis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is Nullable ... Dukc via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is Nullable ... vit via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is Nulla... Chris Paulson-Ellis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is ... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Is ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re:... Chris Paulson-Ellis via Digitalmars-d-learn
