H. S. Teoh wrote:

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:21:42PM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
it looks like ignoring `double` result causes FPU stack imbalance
('cause compiler doesn't insert "FPU pop" instruction), and that
affects the computations.
on 64 bit it doesn't matter, 'cause no FPU is used there.
the fix prolly should be easy: just emit "FPU pop" if function result
is ignored. codegen should have this info at hand, i believe.


Nice catch!  Is there a bug filed for this yet?  If not, it should be.

btw, this is specific to `cast(void)`. if you'll remove the cast, or do something like `cast(void)(pred(i)+42);`, the bug won't be there. so it looks like it is not a codegen bug after all, but glue layer. the codegen is correctly dropping the result without `cast(void)` (`fstp %st(0)` is inserted in `main`), but cannot do that if return type information is stripped.

so it looks that glue layer should not strip return type info.

Reply via email to