Re: scope(success) lowered to try-catch ?

[Cauterite via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 18 June 2018 at 03:58:47 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
...

yeah, at an AST level it makes sense why it was implemented like 
this.
it's unfortunate that there's no straightforward way to express 
'finally(success) {'.