On Friday, 12 April 2019 at 00:02:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 23:55:18 UTC, Alex wrote:
to judge people objectively. This isn't a nursery school and
we are not 3 year olds...
Exactly. So start behaving like a grown-up and professional.
When you ask someone for help on the street, do you curse at
him too?
Um, where the hell did I "curse" at him? See, you are making up
shit. Prove it! The posts are recorded!
See, you do want this to a nursery school... You want your little
rules and regulations and no cursing or you'll get soap in your
mouth.
You want to act like a grown up but you don't wanna be a grown
up. Being a grown up sometimes requires you to not respond to
people that you don't like. Yet you did! In the real world when
someone says shit you don't like and you say shit back and then
claim your in the right when you do the exact same shit doesn't
cut it.
See, you decided to become part of this problem... because you
are part of the problem. You had nothing useful to say, nothing
factual, nothing to add intelligently but you just decided on
your own that you wanted to take sides play these little games.
"Must be something else in your code because it works fine for me
with this shortened example.
https://run.dlang.io/is/o8xESB
Seriously? Do you think you have ESP? Your code isn't even close
to was talking about ;/
Here is is updated that shows the error. You seem to fail to
understand that it is impossible for it to be my code. There is
no way the static if should fail yet the static foreach pass.
They both go together, that is is the whole point of the static
if, to make sure the foreach works, yet it says it doesn't work
when it in fact does(as commenting out the line proves)."
I asked him if he thinks he has ESP, was that cursing him? I told
him his code isn't close to what I was talking about, is that
cursing?
I'm asking a damn question and making a statement. I was trying
to explain to him that there is no way in hell that he could be
right(well, there is a small chances but why would he assume
that?) because he of the nature of the problem.
No where did I cuss him, attack him personally... it's something
you guys decided to interpret as then you get offended and cause
problems and you don't like me telling you to fuck off for saying
I'm causing problems when you are causing problems.
See, you guys are the source. You think your job is to police the
world because you are special. If Bauss got offended or didn't
like my town then he can chose to not respond to me ever again,
that solve that problem.
See, if I'm so fucking hostile to everyone and everyone never
responds to me, guess the fuck what? No one responds, no
problems. At most I could flood the site with useless posts or
some shit like that(which I wouldn't do)..
But instead, what happens is people like you that think you are
do-gooders and you are going to save the world from ilk like me
only make things worse. That is typical of people like you(which
I say because you have proven you are that type of person by
responding rather than just ignoring). At least if you had
something useful to say then maybe it would matter.
Instead, you say I am slinging poop and that gives you the right
to sling poop back... but you also claim you are on the moral
high ground.
Now, that is my assessment of the situation. I claim it is based
on facts. You can object, but you have the right to just STFU and
let other people STFU. But I imagine you will want to continue
being part of the problem.
Seriously, what do you think will come out of your comments? They
have no substance that can possibly have any good outcome. It's
just like the shit I have said here, except my goal is to get you
to realize that you are not contributing to the solution. Same as
Parker with his need to police the the world. Do you really think
it will make things better?
