bearophile Wrote: > Ary Borenszweig: > > Why, of course, the C syntax for types: > > int (*x[5])[3]; > > int (*x)(char); > > int (*[] x)(char); > > *Ugh*... > > Try porting code that uses heavily n-dimensional tensors from C to D, and you > understand why supporting the C syntax for arrays (with inverted coordinates > in the definition) is a godsend :-) > > Bye, > bearophile
I think the right solution for this is to include a tool that rewrites them into D style.
