On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:30:20 +0300, Max Samukha
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:55:27 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
Also, is() is a built-in thing so traits can't do all it does.
Probably, he meant __traits. Another thing to remove is the
underscores. Keywords are highlighted in all editors with D support,
so there is no need to make __traits "stand out" like that. std.traits
could be renamed to something like "std.reflection"
I treat the whole __traits feature as a hack. There are better
alternatives (discussed many times) with same functionality and better
syntax (Foo.traits.isAbstractClass, writefln.traits.isVirtualFunction etc
to name one).
