On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:45:06 +0300, "Denis Koroskin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> could be renamed to something like "std.reflection" > >I treat the whole __traits feature as a hack. There are better >alternatives (discussed many times) with same functionality and better >syntax (Foo.traits.isAbstractClass, writefln.traits.isVirtualFunction etc >to name one). There hasn't been a response from Walter to those discussions. Is it safe to assume __traits is not going to change soon?
