On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Katrina Niolet <[email protected]> wrote: > Stewart Gordon Wrote: > >> Bill Baxter wrote: >> > Qt 4.5 to be LGPL >> > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210 >> > >> > Now we just need a D port... >> >> There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API. >> http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/ >> >> But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code >> I still have. And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these days. >> >> Stewart. > > I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt > would be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real > percentage of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there is > little need (other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more modern > language)
Is there an irc channel or mailing list or google groups list for discussions and questions about qtd? --bb
