Bill Baxter Wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Katrina Niolet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stewart Gordon Wrote: > > > >> Bill Baxter wrote: > >> > Qt 4.5 to be LGPL > >> > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210 > >> > > >> > Now we just need a D port... > >> > >> There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API. > >> http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/ > >> > >> But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code > >> I still have. And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these > >> days. > >> > >> Stewart. > > > > I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt > > would be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real > > percentage of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there > > is little need (other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more > > modern language) > > Is there an irc channel or mailing list or google groups list for > discussions and questions about qtd? > > > --bb
#qtd on FreeNode
