On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Bill Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > Read the whole thread. The guy is just being a doofus. He says "it's > not static type checking" and then later says that the definition > above on Wikipedia is just "one of two definitions of static type > checking", and he's using the other one. Well ok dude, in that case > you were just deliberately ignoring the other (more mainstream) > definition in order to be a pain in the butt. > > Feel free to reply if you don't think he made it obvious in his later > replies that he's just trying to be annoying and pedantic.
Lol, he even says at one point that D is "less type safe than Python." Uh, what? That doesn't hold true in any case.
