Walter Bright: > SafeD is about guaranteeing memory safety, not other issues like integer > overflows. Memory safety is a fairly specifically defined thing.
Then maybe the name of SafeD isn't too much good, because when I hear that name I think about a safe(r) language, and not about memory safety only. So maybe an alternative name can be invented... (but I have no good name to suggest you so far). Bye, bearophile
