Walter Bright:
> Lutger wrote:
> > I've always understood the 'safety' here as safe from buffer overflow
> > exloits and such, instead of safety against bugs in general.
> > (security).
> 
> Exactly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_safety

OK, I'll wait for the coming of SecureD then :-)

Bye,
bearophile

Reply via email to