On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, John Reimer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Christopher, > Anyway, my point is that I had no cause to presume anything about his name > without content from his site. If he is able to publicly and actively > promote his desired lifestyle, then I most surely am able to reject or > refute it, correct? What perhaps you should have suggested is that he keep > his private lifestyle private if he didn't want to be confronted about it, > right?
Reject and refute all you want, but these newsgroups are not the forum for doing it. A blog post of your own or an offline message to the person in question would be a more appropriate response, I think. --bb
