Hello grauzone,
John Reimer wrote:
Hello grauzone,
Oh boy! Come on now... you guys, this is so apparent an issue. I
am actually a little surprised a few of you are so defensive of
this situation. I'm not sure how far you would go to defend
something "evil"... but I become more astounded all the time. How
far does this go before you finally decide it's time to step in?
I hear some of you gripe so strongly (verbally violent) over the
internet marketing and web scripts... and yet you will defend such
things as this so ruthlessly?
Yes. That's exactly because we're not assholes.
So you approve of the material on the website then?
Not necessarily. I don't even know what exactly is on his website.
But I defend free speech, not attacking people because of irrelevant
issues, and all that.
Hmm... irrelevent, eh? If you haven't figured out the content yet... how
are you able to make a decision on whether it is irrelevent or not.
Anyway... you can have no issue with my free speech then. But it's apparently
called "attack" when it's from my side of the fence. I ask you if calling
a person a a**hole can be considered an attack or free speech? I don't call
people names. I think you fail the consistancy test.
I guess you're worried that the personal desires of people like him
lead to the downfall of moral values and society at large or
something, which is why you feel the need of putting pressure on them
in order to stop it? Sounds like a plan.
Yes, good description.
-JJR
