On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Derek Parnell <[email protected]> wrote: >> As for multiple overloads - so what? All I want is the >> name of the function. > > But why? There could be conceivable circumstances in which one needed to > know *which* 'foo' issued the message, one might need finer or more details > to know that.
Then, as Andrei suggested, we need a more flexible and fine-grained reflection mechanism. :)
