On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:51 PM, dsimcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> wrote: > == Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Walter Bright >> <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: >> > Paul D. Anderson wrote: >> >> >> >> b) the features and functions that should be included. >> > >> > I'd say NaNs and unordered comparisons. In other words, it should support >> > the same semantics as float, double and real do. >> opUnorderedCmp? > > What's wrong with just returning some sentinel from opCmp? For example, > define > int.max as the sentinel for when comparing with nans involved, etc. For > opEquals, > we don't have a problem, just return false. >
Oh, hm, I wasn't aware that the NCEG operators actually called opCmp.
