dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
Paul D. Anderson wrote:
b) the features and functions that should be included.
I'd say NaNs and unordered comparisons. In other words, it should support
the same semantics as float, double and real do.
opUnorderedCmp?
What's wrong with just returning some sentinel from opCmp? For example, define
int.max as the sentinel for when comparing with nans involved, etc. For
opEquals,
we don't have a problem, just return false.
IIRC having an opCmp returning floats works, so you could return float.nan.
(I've never used this, but I think it was mentioned in these groups)
