Christopher Wright wrote: > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> There have been quite a few bugs in the I/O functions because the >> infrastructure underneath them has gone through a few major revisions. >> As Don said, D2 is an alpha and it cannot be held to the stability >> standards of a finished product. > > Then I should wait a few revisions before doing anything that depends in > any significant way on Phobos? > > I think there's no point in releasing a product that is known to be > unstable. But I guess it's intended as a preview / request for testing. > What versions of D2 and Phobos are recommended to use for something > vaguely stable and usable?
None. Use D1 if you want stability. The D2 website needs a big red label on the front sayin' "Warning: lark's vomit." Or "Warning: pre-release software; do not use for anything, ever." -- Daniel
