On 11/19/12 1:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2012 07:02:03 Rob T wrote:
So what's up with @property? Is it being depreciated for being
redundant, or will it later be strictly enforced, or is it to be
optionally enforced through a compiler switch?
It didn't used to be necessary, but there are ambiguities without it
(particularly with regards to property functions which return delegates),
I think we need to seriously revisit that. It's a corner case that hurts
everyone everywhere.
and
a number of people don't like the laxness of practically any function with a
particular sort of signature being able to be used as a property function
rather than it being part of the API.
I think UFCS changes the playfield quite a lot. Code using UFCS looks a
whole lot crappier with a bunch of arbitrary extra parens.
Andrei
