On 11/20/2012 09:56 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 13:35:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 06:06:21 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
I'm not sure how it fit in the DIP but &funName is ambiguous when
funName return a reference.
We can just define this away: &funName if it isn't a @property is the
address of the function.
So this is impossible to get the address of the returned
reference.
&funName()
If it is a @property, ALL operations work on the return value, so it
is rewritten as &(funName()).
I agree that this is ho it should work.
+1.
