On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 12:44:44 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Should this be allowed for functions that isn't marked with @property:

foo = 3;

Yes. We should *only* be changing the way @property is implemented. (Namely, actually implementing it!)

Don't want to break existing code. The new changes must be opt in.


If there's both an @property setter and a regular function, the property should be used here.

Reply via email to