On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:26:15 -0000, Adam D. Ruppe
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 12:44:44 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Should this be allowed for functions that isn't marked with @property:
foo = 3;
Yes. We should *only* be changing the way @property is implemented.
(Namely, actually implementing it!)
Don't want to break existing code. The new changes must be opt in.
Usually I'd agree but this is a case of a wart we should just remove IMO.
The fix for breaking cases is simple, add @property.
If there's both an @property setter and a regular function, the property
should be used here.
Agreed. But it's waay clearer whats going on if @property is required to
call functions using this syntax.
R
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
