On 2013-01-19 03:50, Andrey wrote:
I haven't seen such situations yet. According to OOP concept they must be very rare, so I tend to consider them more of architecture and logic mistake (and C++ is one big architecture and logic frankenstein).
In theory and according to the OOP concept they might not be needed but when it comes to actually implement a OO concept it can turn out to be handy to have. That is, accessing a private member in the same module.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
