On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 13:16:03 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 12:55:36 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 19 January 2013 at 01:35:58 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/18/2013 4:55 PM, Andrey wrote:
- Lots of languages don't have access control at all, yet
somehow people use them without problem.
Lots of languages do not even have classes. Lots of languages do
not even have functions. Lots of languages are... assembler.
- As far as I can see, the DMD source has very few private
variables, yet very few (if any) bugs are caused by people
messing up other people's variables.
In the beginning, C++ programs had very few bugs. Then, real
coding in C++ happened. BTW, DMD (not phobos) source is C++
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/blob/master/src/arrayop.c),
not D.
- If you have one class per module, D is no different to
C++/Java/C#.
Yes... And if you define:
struct var *p2=new_from_data(p1->a, p1->b, p1->c);
then you have a copy constructor... Straight, isn't?
