On 1/24/13, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote: > This has turned into a monster. We've taken 2 or 3 wrong turns somewhere.
It is super-ironic that you want to simply pull-out and destroy a feature because it wasn't properly defined or implemented, yet you single-handedly introduced UDAs into the language with its own syntax without any prior approval of the community. Will we be making a "UDAs - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?" thread a year from now?
