Proper property design:
>
> @property int a;
>
gets actually lowered by the compiler to:
>
> int a_;
>
> @property int a() {
> return a_;
> }
> @property int a(int new_a) {
> a_=new_a;
> return a_;
> }
>
-> field property, and get/set property are actually the same thing. ->
It is guaranteed that they behave the same way and can always be
exchanged.
-> Taking the address of the getter/setter also always works, enabling
things like connecting the setter to a signal for example.
I don't know about you guys, but I love this. It is just perfect. What
do I miss?
Best regards,
Robert
