There's times when a member variable manages its own invariant
and any of its values is valid for the containing class, in which
case the container doesn't need to further restrict access to it;
a public struct doesn't need to be wrapped in a get function or
anything.
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Possible @property compromise Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Possible @property compromise Chad Joan
- Re: Possible @property compromise deadalnix
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise deadalnix
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise Adam D. Ruppe
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Possible @property compromise Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Possible @property compromise Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Possible @property compromise TommiT
- Re: Possible @property compromise Michael
