On 2013-01-30 02:40, TommiT wrote:
I always thought that having public member variables is a bad style of programming because of the lack of encapsulation. So, if there's a language feature that enables you to write public member variables, and later on, replace them with property functions, wouldn't that mean that the language is encouraging this particular kind of bad style of programming?
I really don't see much point in properties/methods that just forwards to an instance variable.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
