On 1/31/13 7:01 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I don't think that is a compromise as i don't believe it is @property that is slated for removal, it is designating something a property.
FWIW we want to keep a means to define properties. Andrei
- Re: Possible @property comp... Era Scarecrow
- Re: Possible @property comp... TommiT
- Re: Possible @property comp... TommiT
- Re: Possible @property comp... TommiT
- Re: Possible @property comp... TommiT
- Re: Possible @property comp... Michel Fortin
- Re: Possible @property comp... Jesse Phillips
- Re: Possible @property compromi... Zach the Mystic
- Re: Possible @property comp... Michael
- Re: Possible @property compromise Jesse Phillips
- Re: Possible @property compromise Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Possible @property compromise Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Possible @property compromise Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Possible @property compromise Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: Possible @property compromi... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Possible @property compromise Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: Possible @property compromise Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: Possible @property compromise H. S. Teoh
- Re: Possible @property compromise Michael
